Legal Opinion
Ward v. Ward
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 12, 1978PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Yaccarino, J. S. C.
The issue presented to the court by the facts of this case is one which has not been the subject *357of a reported decision in the jurisdiction, but one which has far-reaching effects upon matrimonial actions. Simply stated, the issue is whether the United States Congress intended that the antialienation provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, P. L. 93-406, 88 Stat. 832, 29 U. 8. C. A. § 1001 et seq. (ERISA), should protect a pensioner from a state court decree directing the trustees of his pension plan to pay over certain amounts of his pension to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Wetmore v. MarkoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ward v. WardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978