Legal Opinion

People v. Haddad

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 2009No. B212880Published

1Opinion of the Court

*272Opinion

TURNER, P. J.

Defendant, Ousama Saadeh Haddad, pled guilty to methamphetamine possession (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)); marijuana possession (Health & Saf. Code, § 11357, subd. (b)); and being under the influence of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11550, subd. (a)). Defendant appeals from a subsequent probation revocation order. Defendant argues he was found in violation of probation based upon a drug-related offense; therefore, he was improperly denied the opportunity to participate in probation pursuant to Penal Code1 section 1210.1. This is commonly referred…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Michael Davis Taylor v. J.S. Stainer, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. People v. StitesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API