Legal Opinion

People v. Stites

California Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1888No. 20377PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

The defendant was charged with the crime of attempting to place an obstruction upon *571the track of the Sutter Street Railroad, in the city and county of San Francisco, and was convicted. He moved for a new trial, and has appealed from' the judgment and order denying his motion. The motion was made upon the ground that errors of law were committed by the court during the trial, and that the verdict was contrary to the evidence.

In the brief filed for appellant here, it is distinctly stated that “ the appellant does not desire a new trial upon any other ground,than that the evidence…

2Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API