Legal Opinion
Chess v. CF Arcis IX LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 22, 2020No. 3:20-cv-01625Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JOHN CHESS, et al., Case No. 20-cv-01625-CRB 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING REMAND AND 10 v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COMPELLING ARBITRATION 11 CF ARCIS IX LLC, 12 Defendant. 13 Two motions are pending in this dispute between a golf club and its members. Named 14 Plaintiffs John Chess and David Orenberg allege that Defendant CF Arcis has wrongfully 15 modified the membership contract for the club. Plaintiffs now move for remand and attorneys’ 16 fees. CF Acris moves to compel arbitration per the arbitration…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.