Legal Opinion

Midland Shoe Co. v. A. L. & K. Dry Goods Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 3, 1926No. 2604. [fn*]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Writ of error refused May 12, 1926. This is a suit in garnishment instituted in the district court of Hale county on January 14, 1924, by the Midland Shoe Company against the A. L. K. Dry Goods Company, a copartnership, of Plainview, Tex., based on a judgment for the sum of $856.76 theretofore obtained in said court by the Midland Shoe Company against Cecil Company, a corporation, of Plainview, Tex. A number of other judgment creditors of Cecil Co. were permitted to intervene in the suit, and the Midland Shoe Company; and said interveners will be called plaintiffs.

The A. L. K. Dry Goods…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Washer v. SmyerTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Owosso Carriage & Sleigh Co. v. McIntosh & WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Livingston Oil Corp. v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Collins-Decker Co. v. CrumplerTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Smith-Calhoun Rubber Co. v. McGhee Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. of North America v. MathersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  2. Midland Shoe Co. v. A. L. & K. Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Bounds v. Home Mut. Life & Accident Ass'n No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. In re Central Metallic Casket Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1959
  5. Johnston v. M. System Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API