Legal Opinion

Midland Shoe Co. v. A. L. & K. Dry Goods Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 19, 1927No. 2881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.

This is a garnishment suit instituted on January 14, 1924, in the district court of Hale county, Tex., by the Midland Shoe Company, a corporation, against the A. L. & K. Dry Goods Company, a copartnership, based on a judgment theretofore obtained by the Midland Shoe Company against Cecil & Company, a corporation, of Plain-view, Tex., for the sum of $856.76.

A number of other judgment creditors of Cecil & Co. intervened in the suit, and the Midland Shoe Company and said interveners will hereafter be called appellants. The A. L. & K. Dry Goods Company, hereinafter called appellee, answered that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Silliman v. GanoTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Kennedy v. BakerTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Milan Bank v. RichmondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  4. Texas Bank & Trust Co. v. TeichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Peters Shoe Co. v. Murray, AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shaw v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Adams v. First State Bank, MonahansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Johnston v. M. System Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Johnston v. M. System Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Monnig Dry Goods Co. v. CopleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API