Ridler v. Madsen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this personal injury lawsuit involving a motor vehicle driven by respondent and owned jointly by respondent and her husband, the district court denied appellant’s motion to add respondent’s husband as a defendant. We affirm the court’s decision that Minnesota’s Safety Responsibility Act does not make respondent’s husband liable for respondent’s actions while driving the vehicle.
FACTS
Appellant James Ridler was involved in a motor vehicle accident with respondent Vicki Madsen. Ridler suffered extensive injuries, and he sued Madsen and others allegedly responsible for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Arneson v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Kangas v. WinquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- City of Minneapolis v. Village of Brooklyn CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947