Legal Opinion

Ridler v. Madsen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 1, 1997No. C1-96-2564Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In this personal injury lawsuit involving a motor vehicle driven by respondent and owned jointly by respondent and her husband, the district court denied appellant’s motion to add respondent’s husband as a defendant. We affirm the court’s decision that Minnesota’s Safety Responsibility Act does not make respondent’s husband liable for respondent’s actions while driving the vehicle.

FACTS

Appellant James Ridler was involved in a motor vehicle accident with respondent Vicki Madsen. Ridler suffered extensive injuries, and he sued Madsen and others allegedly responsible for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Arneson v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Kangas v. WinquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. City of Minneapolis v. Village of Brooklyn CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API