Legal Opinion

Arneson v. Integrity Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 2, 1984No. CX-83-1547PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

The defendant appeals from a summary judgment declaring that its plan of reparation security provides no-fault basic economic loss benefits to plaintiff, who was injured on October 18, 1981, when the 1972 Ford LTD in which he was riding left the road. The defendant contends that the named insured had sold the 1972 Ford LTD four or five days prior to the accident and that the defendant’s policy terminated when the named insured ceased to own the automobile. Because the defendant has raised a genuine issue of material fact, we reverse and remand for trial.

On the date of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Welle v. ProzinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Rohling v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ka Ying Vue v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. American National General Insurance Co. v. SolumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Bank North v. SouleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. ForstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  5. Rife v. One 1987 Chevrolet Cavalier, Minnesota License No. 509-CRC, Vin No. 1G1JE111OHJ112508Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API