Legal Opinion

Hill v. City of Winona

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1990No. C0-89-1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant, an officer and twenty-five year veteran of the Winona Police Department, sought to enjoin enforcement of his chief's order that he submit to a current psychological examination. The chief acted on his statement of concerns about appellant’s behavior, but the city refused to permit grievance procedures on the chiefs action. Although the trial court ordered grievance process after this appeal was commenced, we have before us its earlier decision to require grievance procedures only on the issue of selecting an evaluating clinician. On the appeal from the prior…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 320 v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Minneapolis Federation of Teachers, Local 59 v. Minneapolis Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. University Education Ass'n v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. St. Paul Fire Fighters, Local 21 v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. City of LuverneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Virginia Department of Taxation v. DaughtrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  3. Hill v. City of WinonaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. v. City of LuverneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API