Legal Opinion

Louisville & N. R. v. Pierce

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 6, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN,-Justice.

This appeal marks the second appearance of this case before this Court. Upon the first appeal, a judgment which required appellant to enlarge an existing underpass for the use of appellees was reversed. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Pierce, 313 Ky. 189, 230 S.W.2d 430, 17 A.L.R.2d 1244. There, it was held that appellant’s charter obligation with reference to constructing crossings where its’railroad traversed the land of another was not applicable to the track crossing appellees’ land which is operated under a lease from the Louisville, Henderson, and St. Louis Railroad…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blair v. City of PikevilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  2. Higdon v. Kentucky Gas Transmission CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969
  4. Potter v. ColvinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957
  5. Eric M. Kress v. Linda DixonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API