Legal Opinion

Blair v. City of Pikeville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 5, 1964PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Commissioner.

Appellant Blair asks reversal of a judgment of the Pike Circuit Court denying his claim for damages against appellees, City of Pikeville and its contractor, Mitchell Preston. The appellant’s damage suit arose when appellee city, through its co-appellee Preston, constructed a sewer line over appellant’s Lots 40, 41 and 42 of T. J. Williamson Addition to the City of Pike-ville.

Appellant attacks the adverse judgment on these grounds: (1) The easement under which the city claims is invalid; (2) it was error to direct a verdict for the city; and (3) the court erred in the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Beardslee v. New Berlin Light & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Townsend v. CableCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  3. Commonwealth v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  4. Flynn v. FikeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Central Kentucky Natural Gas Co. v. HulsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Simpson v. Kistler Investment Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Vorherr v. ColdironCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017
  4. Higdon v. Kentucky Gas Transmission CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  5. Minton v. LongCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API