Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 2, 1958No. Civ. No. 7567Published

1Opinion of the Court

HALBERT, District Judge.

Olive Mae Buchanan (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff), the named beneficiary in a policy of life insurance issued to her husband, Russell L. Buchanan, instituted this action in a State court against the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States (hereinafter referred to as defendant) seeking to recover the “face amount” of said policy. Defendant, properly, caused the action to be removed to this Court, Federal jurisdiction being grounded upon the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332(a) (1).

The controversy between the parties revolves around the legal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eagle Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Kazanteno v. California-Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Walker v. Home Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Huber v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API