Legal Opinion

Hamman v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1931No. File No. 5873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

So far as the pleadings are concerned this case is, in all respects, similar to the companion case of Bratberg v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. ante, 452, — A.L.R. — , 238 N. W. 552, heard at the same term. The plaintiff claims he paid $1,457.97 for the combine he purchased and that it cost him $100.00 for repairs and testing the machine in order to determine its fitness.

The answer sets forth the same kind of a written order as the contract in the other cases, including the statement that “it constitutes the entire agreement with reference to the purchase of the above property.”

The answer…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McGregor v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Minneapolis Threshing MacH. Co. v. HockingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. MahonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Minneapolis Steel & MacHinery Co. v. Casey Land AgencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Bratberg v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cleveringa v. KleinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Rasmus v. AO Smith CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958
  3. Deere & Webber Co. v. MochNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API