Smith v. Lanier
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) On the previous appearance of this case (Smith v. Lanier, supra), this court held: “The undisputed evidence showed that there was no unascertained, uncertain, or disputed line between coterminous landowners. The evidence shows that, when a division of the property was 'undertaken between the heirs, the defendant, Mrs. Lanier, was dissatisfied with the portion of the land she received; and that, in order to satisfy her, a new and distinct line was established and her boundary extended in order to give her an additional strip of land.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Farr v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Veal v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Taylor v. Board of Trustees of Glenlock Public SchoolSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Miller v. McGlaunSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Shahan v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gauker v. EubanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Alcorn v. LinkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Jackson v. TolliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Hicks v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Burkett v. HatchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.