Legal Opinion

Smith v. Lanier

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 17, 1947No. 15793PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) On the previous appearance of this case (Smith v. Lanier, supra), this court held: “The undisputed evidence showed that there was no unascertained, uncertain, or disputed line between coterminous landowners. The evidence shows that, when a division of the property was 'undertaken between the heirs, the defendant, Mrs. Lanier, was dissatisfied with the portion of the land she received; and that, in order to satisfy her, a new and distinct line was established and her boundary extended in order to give her an additional strip of land.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farr v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Veal v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  3. Taylor v. Board of Trustees of Glenlock Public SchoolSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Miller v. McGlaunSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  5. Shahan v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gauker v. EubanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Alcorn v. LinkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  3. Jackson v. TolliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  4. Hicks v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Burkett v. HatchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API