Legal Opinion

Veal v. Barber

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 3, 1944No. 14830PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

The verdict for the petitioners was authorized by the evidence, only if acquiescence by acts or declarations of the adjoining land owners established the dividing line, as. provided in the Code, § 85-1602. As to acquiescence by the defendant in this line, the evidence authorized a finding that in 1916 the defendant by declarations acquiesced therein, and was sufficient to authorize a finding that the petitioners, by acts for more than seven years, acquiesced in that line as being the dividing line between the properties. Therefore the evidence was sufficient to show the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Osteen v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Bradley v. SheltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Amos v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  4. Gornto v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  5. Long v. GilbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Warwick v. Ocean Pond Fishing ClubSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Gauker v. EubanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  3. Jackson v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Dye v. DotsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Lane v. VarnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API