Taylor v. Board of Trustees of Glenlock Public School
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
1. No matter what the oral agreement was as to where the dividing line between the two properties was to be, it was merged into the subsequent deeds, became functus officio when the deeds were executed, and the rights of the parties are based alone upon the descriptions contained in the deeds. Compare Loftis v. Clay, 164 Ga. 845, 848 (139 S. E. 668); Keiley v. Citizens Savings Bank & Trust Co., 173 Ga. 11, 16 (159 S. E. 527); Kennedy v. Kennedy, 183 Ga. 432, 440 (188 S. E. 722, 109 A. L. R. 1143).
2. The rule that a parol agreement between owners of coterminous properties that a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Farr v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Kennedy v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Keiley v. Citizens Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Miller v. McGlaunSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Loftis v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jordan v. FlyntSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Kollen v. High Point Forest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Ingram v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Holland v. ShackelfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Johnson v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.