Legal Opinion

Nagel v. Prescott & Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 2, 1964No. C 63-700PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNELL, Chief Judge.

This action arises out of the plaintiffs’ investment in the stock of Crowell-Collier Company. Acting upon the alleged guarantee of the defendants that said stock would produce an imminent windfall, the plaintiffs invested heavily in Crowell-Collier stock. As the stock declined in value, the plaintiffs were forced to sell out at a substantial loss. The plaintiffs now complain that the guarantee which the defendants proffered was ill-founded, and they seek to repair their damage at the expense of the defendants because of some alleged misrepresentations by the defendants in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Saberton v. GreenwaldOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Independence Shares Corporation v. DeckertCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  4. Derdiarian v. Futterman CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  5. Meisel v. North Jersey Trust Company of Ridgewood, NJDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,213 Hill York Corporation v. American International Franchises, Inc., Gurn H. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. deHaas v. Empire Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  4. Hecht v. Harris, Upham & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1968
  5. Morton Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API