Legal Opinion

Altman, Assignee v. Arata

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1937No. Appeal, 93PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

This is an action in assumpsit brought by Louis H. Altman as assignee of Wolf Greenblatt, the vendee in a written agreement for the sale of real estate, against Matilda Arata, the vendor, to recover damages on account of the failure of the vendor to convey the real estate in accordance with the terms of the contract. The plaintiff claimed as damages the difference between the contract price and the market value at the time the contract was breached, and a down payment of $100 received by the vendor on execution of the agreement. The case was tried before a judge without a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Rineer v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Seidlek v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  5. Orr v. GreinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kargiatly v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Delvitto v. Schiavo Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Dietz v. Bielitsky, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1964
  4. Plasterer Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API