Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Fair Employment Practices Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman
Plaintiff, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (hereinafter “Bell”), provides for its employees a “Wage Continuation Plan” as a fringe benefit for periods of nonoccupational, temporary, medically approved sickness or off-the-job injuries, paying said disabled employees a percentage of their regular wages for a limited number of weeks commencing with the second week of disability. The sole exceptions from this plan are employees temporarily disabled because of normal pregnancies, who are placed on uncompensated maternity leaves of absence and sustain a reduction in fringe benefits as well as a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. WetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Nashville Gas Co. v. SattySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Massachusetts Electric Co. v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Commissioner of Labor & IndustryMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Fair Employment Practices CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Maryland Commission on Human RelationsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.