Legal Opinion
American International Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 16, 1996No. B097359PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARON, J.
This case presents an issue recently addressed by the Supreme Court in Waller v. Truck Inc. Exchange, Inc. (1995) 11 Cal.4th 1 [44 Cal.Rptr.2d 370, 900 P.2d 619], “whether a commercial general liability insurer is required to defend a third party action that seeks incidental emotional distress damages caused by the insured’s noncovered economic or business torts.” (11 Cal.4th at p. 10.) In conformity with that decision, we conclude that the trial court herein properly found there was no coverage, no potential for coverage, and no duty to defend where the policy applies to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Chatton v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- McLaughlin v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Anthem Electronics, Inc. v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a California Corporation Federal Insurance Company, an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Quan v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Ray v. Valley Forge InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Medical Records Associates, Inc. v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Stein-Brief Group, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.