Legal Opinion

Alaska Commercial Co. v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 2, 1904No. 963PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

It is contended by the plaintiff in error that the court erred in denying its application to so amend its answer as to set forth the terms of the towage contract. The original answer made no affirmative allegation as to the contract, but contained a general denial of all of the facts alleged in the complaint as to the terms of the contract and the breach thereof. The case went to trial more than six months after the issues were made up. On the trial the defendant in error took all of his evidence and rested. The plaintiff in error, after occupying two days in introducing evidence for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Steamer SyracuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Marsh v. . DodgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. The Somers N. SmithDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1903
  4. JenksDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1893
  5. Burley v. German-American BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Thompson Towing & Wrecking Ass'n v. McGregorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
  3. The OceanicaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909
  4. Hall-Scott Motor Car Co. v. Universal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  5. Mylroie v. British Columbia Mills Tug & Barge Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API