Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Chapman

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 19, 1988No. Docket Nos. F009006, F009065PublishedCited by 2 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STONE (W. A.), J.

The primary issue presented by this appeal is whether, upon registration of a foreign support order with an accompanying statement of arrearage, a support obligor must challenge the alleged amount of unpaid support arrearage within 20 days of notice of the registration. The question requires an examination of sections 1697 through 1699 of the Code of Civil Procedure. We will conclude that a challenge to the amount of alleged arrearage is not precluded by the obligor’s failure to object within the 20-day period provided in section 1699, subdivision (b).

Statement of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In Re AlpineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Wilkins v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. City of San Francisco v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Meyer v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cowan v. Moreno, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  2. Robert Cowan v. Nancy Moreno, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API