City of San Francisco v. Mooney
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Appeal by the defendant Delaney from the judgment and from the order denying him a new trial.
*587The action was commenced by the city and county of San Francisco against the defendants named, and many others, to recover certain lands claimed and held by the defendants adversely to the city. The land claimed by appellant is part of the so-called Lafayette park. Lafayette park was delineated and described as a public park or square upon the Van Ness map. The facts of this case are identical in all essential particulars with those in the case of Hoadley v. San Francisco, 50 Cal. 265, and Sawyer v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilkinson v. LelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
- People ex rel. Bryant v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Hoadley v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Hoadley's Administrators v. San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Sawyer v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rice v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Blalock v. RidgwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Pacific Acceptance Corp. v. McCueMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- McCurrie v. DelaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Holladay v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.