Hamilton v. Miller
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
This case is before the Court on Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals.1 The issue is whether the circuit court properly found as a matter of law that respondent Tiffany Layne Miller was not acting within the scope of her employment at the time she was involved in an automobile accident.
I. FACTS
Petitioners in this case, Caroline A. and George C. Hamilton (Hamiltons), brought this action against Tiffany Layne Miller (Miller), Mary Ann Smith (Smith), and Nationwide Insurance Company (Nationwide) for personal injuries and loss of consortium resulting from an accident…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Manning v. QuinnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Hancock v. Aiken Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
- Jamison v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
- Hamilton v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
3Cited by14 opinions
- Koester v. Carolina Rental Center, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Wade v. Berkeley CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Frazier v. BadgerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Moshtaghi v. the CitadelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
- Hill v. York County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.