Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Miller

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 5, 1990No. 23146PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

This case is before the Court on Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals.1 The issue is whether the circuit court properly found as a matter of law that respondent Tiffany Layne Miller was not acting within the scope of her employment at the time she was involved in an automobile accident.

I. FACTS

Petitioners in this case, Caroline A. and George C. Hamilton (Hamiltons), brought this action against Tiffany Layne Miller (Miller), Mary Ann Smith (Smith), and Nationwide Insurance Company (Nationwide) for personal injuries and loss of consortium resulting from an accident…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Manning v. QuinnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Hancock v. Aiken Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  3. Jamison v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Hamilton v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Koester v. Carolina Rental Center, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Wade v. Berkeley CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Frazier v. BadgerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Moshtaghi v. the CitadelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Hill v. York County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API