Legal Opinion

Jamison v. Howard

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 14, 1978No. 20766PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Chief Justice:

This action was instituted by plaintiff-appellant against the defendant-respondent, George Howard, Jr., as the principal, and defendant James Hallums, as Howard’s agent, to recover damages sustained from a gunshot wound which rendered appellant a paraplegic. The respondent Howard alone moved for summary judgment. His motion for summary judgment was granted by the lower court upon the ground that there was no evidence upon which to base the conclusion that defendant Hallums was his agent at the time of the alleged assault, which showing was, admittedly, necessary in order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gardner v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  2. Jones v. ElbertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fernander v. ThigpenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. Young v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  3. Young v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Fitzer ex rel. Fitzer v. Greater Greenville South Carolina Young Men's Christian Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  5. Crittenden v. Thompson-Walker Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API