Legal Opinion
Hancock v. Aiken Mills, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 31, 1936No. 14267PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fishburne.
This action was instituted by Leonard Hancock, by his guardian ad litem, against the defendant, Aiken Mills, Inc., for the recovery of damages alleged to have been suffered by him on or about February 10, 1933. The plaintiff, at the time of the accident hereinafter referred to, lacked four months of being- thirteen years of age. He resided with his parents in the defendant’s mill village at Langley, in this State. The defendant owned the mill village and rented one of its houses on the Augusta road to Nish Hancock, the father of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Morier v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Sweeden v. Atkinson Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Erie Railroad v. HiltSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Giannini v. CampodonicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Fusselman v. Yellowstone Valley Land & Irrigation Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1917
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Crittenden v. Thompson-Walker Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Lane v. Modern Music, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Wade v. Berkeley CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Hyde v. Southern Grocery Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- John O'Shea v. Anthony J. Welch, and American Drug Stores, Inc., Doing Business as Osco Drug, Farmers Insurance Company, Inc., Defendant-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.