Legal Opinion

Hendrie v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 12, 1963No. 20055PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sutton.

This is primarily a case relating to the proximate cáusation of damage to a swimming pool constructed under contract by the John G. Hendrie Company for defendant in error in Rangely, Colorado. We shall refer to the parties by name or as they appeared in the trial court.

The Commissioners sued both the Hendrie Company and John G. Hendrie individually. Hendrie held the franchise for Paddock Swimming Pools and was joined because he had assertedly acted in both his personal and corporate capacities in the transaction. No material error is claimed here as to this point…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Denver, South Park & Pacific R. R. v. ConwaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  2. Weaver v. First National Bank of LimonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  3. Mosko v. WaltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. United Telecommunications, Inc., a Kansas Corporation v. American Television and Communications Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  3. Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
  4. York Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Groussman Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. City of Westminster v. Centric-Jones ConstructorsColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API