Legal Opinion

Grant v. Yates

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

Some argument was made to the effect that it was by no means clear that the language used by the defendant related to the gist of the charge in the criminal complaint and that it could not be said that he charged her with being a sport. For the purposes of the case we shall assume that defendant’s language did relate to such charge. This raises the question whether or not charging an unmarried woman with being a sport charges her with having had unlawful sexual intercourse or of being a prostitute. The trial court came to the conclusion that it did not, arid we concur in such conclusion. No…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. K v. HWisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Robertson v. EdelsteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Hanson v. FeulingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. M v. JWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Singler v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Yoke v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API