Legal Opinion

Yoke v. Cole

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

Appellants argue that inasmuch as the article in question in no wise specifically charges the plaintiff with having committed any crime in connection with the death of his wife, or that he was the beneficiary of any insurance policy on her life, that an innocent meaning should be given to the expressions used in preference to a construction which would result in charging a crime; also that all the contained expressions should be. construed in the plain and popular sense in which they would naturally be understood, and that, as so construed, no such meaning can be given to them as is ascribed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Washington Post Co. v. ChalonerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Kellar v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Morgan v. Republican Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Hofflund v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Lubcke v. TeckamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ellsworth v. Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Singler v. Journal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Woods v. Sentinel-News Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. De Husson v. Hearst Corp. Gerds v. Hearst Corp. Heilpap v. Hearst Corp. Rajsich v. Hearst CorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API