Legal Opinion

Town of Wellston v. State Industrial Court

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 2, 1963No. 40434PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The decisive question presented here for our determination is whether the Town of Wellston, an -uninsured employer, came within the purview, of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Employer contends on the day of decedent’s fatal injury he was the only- workman in its employ who was engaged in hazardous employment and seeks *291to set aside the trial tribunal’s award to the widow and a dependent child.

The question so posed is governed by the provisions of 85 O.S.1961 § 11, which so far as pertinent here are:

“ * * * the provisions of this Act shall not apply to any employer if he shall employ less than…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mashburn v. City of GrandfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Payton v. City of AnadarkoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Teague v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Roy Deaton Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Deatherage & Renfro v. StoreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Teschner v. HoranSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  2. Pittsburg Plate Glass Company v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. South v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API