Roy Deaton Co. v. State Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
This is an original proceeding in this court brought by Roy Deaton Company, as petitioner, to obtain a review of an award made by the State Industrial Commission in favor of the respondent Melvin L. Houck. In this opinion the parties will be referred to as petitioner and respondent.
It is conceded that one J. M. Powell was an independent contractor of the petitioner, and as such undertook to make certain repairs on a store building in the city of Tulsa, and that the said J. M. Powell employed the respondent to perform certain manual and mechanical work on said building, and that on March 13,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Pine v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Deatherage & Renfro v. StoreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- South Oklahoma Town Co. v. AcreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck and Company v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Stilwell v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Town of Wellston v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Karns v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Deep Rock Oil Corporation v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.