Prudential Securities, Inc. v. Kucinski
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HODGES, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 2). Defendants have responded and filed a motion to compel arbitration (Doc. 4). The motions are now ripe for decision. For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction will be granted in part and denied in part and Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration will be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
On February 6, 1996, Defendants filed a statement' of claim, alleging claims against Plaintiff and others, with the National Association of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Perry v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Dori Zardui-Quintana v. Louis M. RichardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Painewebber Incorporated v. H. William HofmannCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith Barney, Inc. v. HylandDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1997