Legal Opinion

Folda Real Estate Co. v. Jacobsen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 4, 1924No. 10,586PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The court below dismissed a bill for foreclosure of a mortgage, brought by plaintiff in error, on the ground that it was barred by the limitation of chapter 42, S. L. 1917. The question is: Was this right? The said chapter 42 is as follows: “When a cause of action has heretofore arisen or hereafter arises in another state * * * and by the laws thereof an action thereon cannot there be maintained against a person by reason of the lapse of time, an action thereon shall not be maintained against him in this state, *18except in favor of one who has been a citizen of this state and who has held the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bruner v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Munson v. MarksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  3. Holmquist v. GilbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  4. McGovney v. GwillimColorado Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Foot v. BurrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Foster Lumber Co., Inc. v. Weston Constructors, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Trussell v. United Underwriters, Ltd.District Court, D. Colorado · 1964
  3. Parker v. McGintySupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Foothills Holding Corp. v. Tulsa Rig, Reel & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  5. Greene v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API