Legal Opinion · Dissent

In the Matter of Gibraltor Amusements, Ltd., Bankrupt-Appellant, and the Wurlitzer Company and Wurlitzer Acceptance Corporation, Petitioning Creditors

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 24, 1961No. 26812_1Published

1DissentFriendly, Circuit Judge

With some regret as regards this particular bankrupt, I respectfully dissent from the conclusion that Wurlitzer and its wholly owned subsidiary, Wurlitzer Acceptance Corporation (WAC), may be regarded as two separate creditors for the purpose of § 59, sub. b of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 95, sub. b.

Assuming as I do that WAC had sufficient independence of its parent to be regarded as a separate corporation under state law in contract or tort litigation, Bartle v. Home Owners Co-Op, Inc., 1955, 309 N.Y. 103, 127 N.E.2d 832, or under federal law for income tax purposes, it does not follow…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. Markham v. CabellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Burnet v. GuggenheimSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API