Legal Opinion

Rates Technology Inc. v. Cequel Communications, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 25, 2014No. 13 Civ. 0011(ALC)(FM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Rates Technology Inc. (“RTF”) filed the instant action against Defendant Cequel Communications, LLC d/b/a Sud-*412denlink Communications (“Cequel”), alleging infringement of its patents related to the routing of telephone calls based on cost and a method for updating the database in a telephone call routing system. Defendant moves to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant argues Plaintiff cannot establish personal jurisdiction where Defendant has no contacts…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Regenlab U.S. LLC v. Estar Techs. Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Lebron v. EncarnacionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  3. Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Erie PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
  4. Xerox Corporation v. Monument Peak Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API