Legal Opinion

Chatham Motor Co. v. Lincoln Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 27, 1923No. 14367PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, B. J.

1. “The holder of a note is presumed to be such bona fide and for value.” Civil Code (1910), §4288; Rhodes v. Beall, 73 Ga. 641; Wade v. Elliott, 11 Ga. App. 646, 648 (75 S. E. 989); Brantley v. Merchants & Farmers Bank, 22 Ga. App. 667 (97 S. E. 109). The allegation of the petition, that the note sued on, indorsed by the payee, was negotiated by the payee to the plaintiff, was good as against the ground of general demurrer that the petition failed to disclose that' the plaintiff was a bona fide purchaser for value before maturity. No other basis of the general demurrer that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. English v. RosenkrantzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
  2. Johnson v. BattleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Turner v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. City of Tallapoosa v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  5. Baldwin v. LoweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pattison v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  2. Brown v. Marbut-Williams Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Johnson v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. Cassini v. Highlands Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  5. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API