Legal Opinion

Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Barber

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1925No. 16193Published

1Opinion of the CourtBloodwortii, J.

-1. “Where evidence is offered in mass, and parts of it are competent, an objection going to the entire evidence, ■without specifically pointing out that which is incompetent, will not avail the objecting party in the reviewing court.” Knight v. State, 143 Ga. 678 (6). “‘Where evidence is offered and objected to, and a portion thereof is admissible and a part objectionable, unless the illegal portion is specified and properly objected to, the whole will be admitted/ City of Atlanta v. Sciple, 19 Ga. App. 694 (3), 698 (93 S. E. 38); Luke v. State, 26 Ga. App. 175 (1), 176 (106 S. E. 199), and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. King Hardware Co. v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  2. Knight v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. City of Atlanta v. ScipleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Luke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Collier v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API