Haupt v. La Brea Heating & Air Conditioning Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
We are reversing the judgment because it was entered without any supporting findings of fact, although evidence was received and findings were not waived. The issue of this appeal is whether there was a timely request for findings. We have concluded that the request was timely.
Concurrently with the filing of this opinion, we are filing one in the case of Engleman v. Green (Civ. A. 8345), ante, p. 882 [270 P.2d 127], another case where findings were requested but the judgment was entered without them. In principle the twp .eases are identical, but at one point the facts do not run parallel.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Petroleum Midway Co. v. ZahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Engleman v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Franks v. CesenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sanders v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Stoumen v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- In Re Custody of ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Zenker-Felt Imports v. MalloyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Hardy v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.