Borzillo v. Borzillo (In Re Borzillo)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
A. INTRODUCTION
The instant proceeding to determine whether certain obligations undertaken by the Debtor-husband in a separation agreement with his ex-wife are nondischargeable as support and alimony to her under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(5), or are dischargeable as elements of a property settlement, obliges us to apply the principles set forth in In re Gianakas, 917 F.2d 759 (3d Cir.1990). We conclude that, while Gianakas references “the language and substance of the agreement” as one of three indicators to be considered in such a determination, a strong…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re Paul Chris Gianakas, Debtor. Karen Gianakas v. Paul Chris GianakasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- MacDonald v. MacDonald (In Re MacDonald)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
- Buccino v. BuccinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Armento v. Armento (In Re Armento)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bryer v. Hetrick (In Re Bryer)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Brunson v. Austin (In Re Austin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Krein v. Hanagan (In Re Krein)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999
- In Re KingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Alaska · 2010
- Townsend v. Townsend (In Re Townsend)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 1992