Legal Opinion

Board of Law Examiners v. Stevens

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1994No. D-3694PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCornyn, Justice

This controversy between an applicant for admission to the Texas Bar and the Board of Law Examiners (“Board” or “BLE”) requires us to interpret the minimum standards for moral character and fitness contained in the Texas DISCIPLINARY Rules of Professional Conduct, and to clarify the process by which courts should review Board decisions. We hold that the court of appeals misinterpreted the Disciplinary Rules and misapplied the standard of review. Aecord-ingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and affirm the Board’s decision.

I

Edward H. Stevens, III, who was licensed to practice…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Sansone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. SizemoreTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. RAILROAD COM'N v. Pend Oreille Oil & Gas Co., Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Matter of HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Mauricio Rodriguez Celis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2011
  3. Texas Department of Public Safety v. Lavender, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  4. Nussbaum v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1996
  5. In re HylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API