Legal Opinion · Dissent

Evans v. Pyramid Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1992Published

1DissentCrew Iii, J.

I respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority that the question of whether a defect is so trivial as to be nonactionable cannot be decided solely on the basis of a predetermined depth of a sidewalk depression or difference in elevation. However, it has been repeatedly held by all four Appellate Divisions that a difference in elevation of one inch or less, where the complained of defect possesses none of the characteristics of a trap or snare, is nonactionable (see, Hecht v City of New York, 89 AD2d 524, mod on other grounds 60 NY2d 57; Mascaro v State of New York, 46 AD2d 941, affd 38…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hecht v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Mascaro v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Mascaro v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. Dykstra v. Windridge Condominium OneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Hecht v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API