Mascaro v. State
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. There was insufficient proof in this case on which to posit a finding that there was a duty on the part of the State to maintain the curb in issue here. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the Appellate Division. Our disposition makes it unnecessary to decide between the Court of Claims’ and the Appellate Division’s findings of fact on the issues of negligence and notice.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Guerrieri v. SummaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Tesak v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Morales v. Riverbay Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Marinaccio v. LeChambord RestaurantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Evans v. Pyramid Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.