Legal Opinion
Raynor v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 6, 2017No. 14-36090PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Oregon law requires insurance policies to conform with the standard provisions of the Oregon Insurance Code. Or. Rev. Stat. § 742.021. Under the standard provisions, insureds who suffer from continuing loss have three years and ninety days “after the termination of the period for which the insurer is liable” to file suit. Or. Rev. Stat. §§ 743.429, .441. Oregon law permits insurers to issue policies with alternatively worded provisions, but only when those alternatively worded provisions are approved by the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services. Or. Rev. Stat. §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oglesby v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
- Laidlaw v. Commercial Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Doyle v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Mid-Century Insurance. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Providence Health Plan v. WinchesterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jacob Benson v. Casa De Capri EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Gibran Figueroa-BeltranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Jorge Romero-Millan v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Christopher LawrenceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Andrew Abraham v. Corizon Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.