Legal Opinion
Doyle v. City of Medford
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 4, 2009No. 07-35753PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER CERTIFYING A QUESTION TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OREGON
ORDER
Plaintiffs, who are former employees of Defendant City of Medford, argue that the City’s policy of denying health insurance coverage to retirees violates Oregon Revised Statutes section 243.303, City Resolution No. 5715, and the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs contend that section 243.303 and Resolution No. 5715 confer on them a vested property interest in health care benefits after retirement, of which the City deprived them without due process of law. Because the question whether the statute and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Jack Allen v. City of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Potrero Hills Landfill, Inc. v. County of SolanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Doyle v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Doyle v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Doyle v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Doyle v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.