Reynolds v. Wargus

The ownership of the car driven by thevde-fendant Wargus at the time of the accident is the bone of contention. Upon that issue and the co-operation of Wargus depends the liability of the appellant under'its coverage policy. The appellant contends that the court erred in not directing a verdict in its favor; in the admission and rejection of evidence; in its instructions to the jury; and in refusing a separate trial on the issue of coverage. On the evidence there was a sharp issue of fact as to the ownership of the car driven by Wargus, appellant'contending that Simpson had sold the car to…