Jacobson v. Bryan

{dissenting). If the certificate of the officer that the collision was a “sideswipe” of the cars was improperly admitted, as seems to be the case under Reynolds v. Wargus, 240 Wis. 94, 2 N. W. (2d) 842, I fail to see.how we can hold that it is not a prejudicial error. As to the sufficiency of the objection to the admission of the traffic officer’s report, it appears that the plaintiff was making a general offer of a paper which ordinarily would not be qualified as evidence. There was no reason for supplementing the testimony already given and it was not offered for the purpose of refreshing…