Legal Opinion

Cook v. Kittson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1897No. Nos. 10,501—(111)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of tbe municipal court of St.. Paul, Orr, J., denying a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Defendant made a written proposition to lease to-plaintiff a certain dwelling for tbe term of three years at a stated. *475rental per month, which proposition the latter, in writing,, accepted. Upon defendant’s refusal to comply with the contract, plaintiff brought an action to recover damages for its breach. A general demurrer was interposed to the complaint, which demurrer was overruled. An answer was then filed, and a trial had by the court, without a jury, which resulted in findings of fact and a conclusion of law that plaintiff was entitled to judgment in the sum of $180. This appeal is from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Selover v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Stevens v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Wilson v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. First National Bank v. HolanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Firemen's InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. C. E. Stevens Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Disbrow v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Delasca v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Scott v. HaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Eaton v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API