Legal Opinion

Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Firemen's Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 30, 1895No. Nos. 9552-(71)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county in favor of plaintiff for $9,123.78, entered in pursuance of the findings and order of Smith, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Action on a policy of insurance against loss by fire on grain owned by plaintiff, or held by it in trust or on commission, or sold but not delivered, “while contained in their frame ironclad, steam-power elevator building, situate on their dock at Gladstone, Michigan.”

While defendant’s counsel have made over 30 assignments of error, their entire brief of 85 pages is devoted to the discussion of the first two, which relate to the refusal of the trial court to allow the de*316fendant to amend its answer. The fire which destroyed the grain covered by the policy occurred November 29, 1891. Defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Home Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Peterson v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Hahn v. BettingenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. State v. HulderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Scott v. HaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Keigher v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API