Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Tinelli, Sr. v. Frank E. Redl and Hankin, Hanig, Stall & Caplicki

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 20, 1999No. 1999PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant Joseph Tinelli appeals from an order and judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Wood, J), adopting in its entirety the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge (Eaton, M.J.), recommending that summary judgment be granted in favor of defendants-appellees Frank Redi and Hankin, Hanig, Stall & Caplicki. 1 We affirm the grant of summary judgment substantially for the reasons stated by the district court and magistrate judge. We write only to address Tinelli’s malpractice claim as it relates to Redl’s failure to perfect the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Leonard Greene and Joyce Greene v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. Marianna Distasio v. Perkin Elmer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. McCarthy v. Olin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Holmes v. GrubmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Frank McKithen v. Richard Brown, District Attorney, County of Queens, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. Fischer & Mandell LLP v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. Runner v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Governmental Interinsurance Exchange v. JudgeIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API