Legal Opinion

Cynthia Larson v. United Healthcare Insurance Co

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 26, 2013No. 12-1256PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYKES, Circuit Judge.

This proposed class action alleges that six major health-insurance companies are violating Wisconsin law by requiring co-payments for chiropractic care. The state insurance code prohibits health insurers from excluding coverage for chiropractic services if their policies cover the diagnosis and treatment of the same condition by a physician or osteopath. See Wis. Stat. § 632.87(3)(a). The insurance policies at issue here provide this coverage, although like other healthcare services, the chiropractic coverage is subject to copayment requirements. The plaintiffs contend…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Chicago Building Design, P.C. v. Mongolian House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Laura Divane v. Northwestern UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Andrew Albert v. Oshkosh CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
  4. New York State Psychiatric Ass'n v. UnitedHealth GroupCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  5. Teamsters Local Union No. 705 v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API